Frequently Asked Question List for TeX
The rules in a LaTeX table are by default 0.4pt
thick;
this is in fact a default built in at the lowest level, and applies to
all rules (including those separating blocks of running text).
Sometimes, however, we look at a table and find we want the rules to stand out — perhaps to separate the text from the rest of the body text, or to make the sections of the table stand out from one another. However, a quick review of any LaTeX manual will reveal no technique for making any one rule stand out, and a little experimentation shows that it is indeed pretty difficult to prevent a change “bleeding” out to affect other rules in the same table.
If you look at what we have to say on the design of tables, elsewhere among these FAQs, and you may sense that the design of LaTeX simply skipped the issues surrounding table design: that’s presumably why there’s no facilities to help you.
Specifically, the length \arrayrulewidth
affects the thickness of
the rules (both horizontal and vertical) within both
tabular
and array
environments. If you
change from the default (see above) only as far as
\setlength{\arrayrulewidth}{1pt}
the change is remarkably striking. However, really quite subtle user
level programming proves incapable of changing just one rule:
it’s necessary to delve into the (rather tricky) code of \hline
and \cline
themselves.
Fortunately, this job has already been done for the community: the
booktabs
package defines three different classes of rule
(\toprule
, \midrule
and \bottomrule
), and the package
documentation offers hints on how to use them. You are
strongly advised to read the documentation pretty carefully.
The memoir
class includes the booktabs
package, and
repeats the documentation in its compendious manual.
Note that none of the above mentions the issue of the weight of
vertical rules (except in passing). For the reasons, see the
documentation of the booktabs
package (again); vertical
rules in tables are in any case even more trickily coded than are
horizontal rules, and if their lack of configurability makes them
still less attractive, so much the better for the design of your
document.